Skip Navigation


Brain Advance Access originally published online on March 23, 2005
Brain 2005 128(5):1155-1167; doi:10.1093/brain/awh472
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
128/5/1155    most recent
awh472v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teichmann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bachoud-Lévi, A.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Teichmann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bachoud-Lévi, A.-C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

The role of the striatum in rule application: the model of Huntington's disease at early stage

Marc Teichmann1,3, Emmanuel Dupoux3, Sid Kouider3, Pierre Brugières3, Marie-Françoise Boissé2, Sophie Baudic1, Pierre Cesaro2, Marc Peschanski1 and Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi1,2,4

1 INSERM U421, IM3/Paris XII and 2 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP/HP, Créteil and ENS, 3 Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique, UMR8554, EHESS-ENS-CNRS and 4 Departement d'Etudes Cognitives, Ecole Normale Supérieure (ENS), Paris, France

Correspondence to: Dr A.-C. Bachoud-Lévi, Equipe Avenir, INSERM U421/Faculté de Médecine Paris XII, 94010 Créteil, France E-mail: bachoud{at}lscp.ehess.fr

The role of the basal ganglia, and more specifically of the striatum, in language is still debated. Recent studies have proposed that linguistic abilities involve two distinct types of processes: the retrieving of stored information, implicating temporal lobe areas, and the application of combinatorial rules, implicating fronto-striatal circuits. Studies of patients with focal lesions and neurodegenerative diseases have suggested a role for the striatum in morphological rule application, but functional imaging studies found that the left caudate was involved in syntactic processing and not morphological processing. In the present study, we tested the view that the basal ganglia are involved in rule application and not in lexical retrieving in a model of striatal dysfunction, namely Huntington's disease at early stages. We assessed the rule–lexicon dichotomy in the linguistic domain with morphology (conjugation of non-verbs and verbs) and syntax (sentence comprehension) and in a non-linguistic domain with arithmetic operations (subtraction and multiplication). Thirty Huntington's disease patients (15 at stage I and 15 at stage II) and 20 controls matched for their age and cultural level were included in this study. Huntington's disease patients were also assessed using the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) and MRI. We found that early Huntington's disease patients were impaired in rule application in the linguistic and non-linguistic domains (morphology, syntax and subtraction), whereas they were broadly spared with lexical processing. The pattern of performance was similar in patients at stage I and stage II, except that stage II patients were more impaired in all tasks assessing rules and had in addition a very slight impairment in the lexical condition of conjugation. Finally, syntactic rule abilities correlated with all markers of the disease evolution including bicaudate ratio and performance in executive function, whereas there was no correlation with arithmetic and morphological abilities. Together, this suggests that the striatum is involved in rule processing more than in lexical processing and that it extends to linguistic and non-linguistic domains. These results are discussed in terms of domain-specific versus domain-general processes of rule application.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
M. Teichmann, V. Gaura, J.-F. Demonet, F. Supiot, M. Delliaux, C. Verny, P. Renou, P. Remy, and A.-C. Bachoud-Levi
Language processing within the striatum: evidence from a PET correlation study in Huntington's disease
Brain, April 1, 2008; 131(4): 1046 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
P. Ford Dominey, M. Hoen, and T. Inui
A Neurolinguistic Model of Grammatical Construction Processing
J. Cogn. Neurosci., December 1, 2006; 18(12): 2088 - 2107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
M. Teichmann, E. Dupoux, S. Kouider, and A.-C. Bachoud-Levi
The Role of the Striatum in Processing Language Rules: Evidence from Word Perception in Huntington's Disease.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., September 1, 2006; 18(9): 1555 - 1569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.