Brain Advance Access originally published online on December 5, 2005
Brain 2006 129(3):747-753; doi:10.1093/brain/awh705
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tracking the recovery of visuospatial attention deficits in mild traumatic brain injury
Department of Human Physiology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA
Correspondence to: Paul van Donkelarr E-mail: paulvd{at}darkwing.uoregon.edu
The goal of the current investigation was to probe the deficits in the alerting, orienting and executive components of visuospatial attention in individuals who have recently suffered a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and to assess the rate and degree of recovery for each of these components over a month post-injury. A group design was employed to assess and compare the performance of participants (12 males, 8 females; mean age: 21 ± 1.74 years) identified with mTBI relative to control subjects matched for gender, age, height, weight and activity level. Participants performed the attentional network test, designed to isolate the constituents of attention into alerting, orienting and executive components. Reaction times (RTs) and response accuracy were the main dependent variables. The results showed that the orienting and executive components were significantly affected by mTBI immediately after the injury, whereas the alerting component was not. Furthermore, participants with mTBI recovered from the deficits in the orienting component of attention within a week of their injury, whereas the deficits in the executive component remained throughout the month post-injury. In addition, the RT cost to generate accurate compared with inaccurate responses was significantly larger in participants with mTBI than in controls, and this difference was maintained throughout the 1 month testing period. These findings indicate that the regions of the brain associated with the orienting and executive components of visuospatial attention may be most susceptible to neural damage resulting from mTBI. Moreover, the lack of recovery in the executive component indicates that the degree and time course for recovery may be regionally specific.
Key Words: attention; mTBI; executive function; recovery
Abbreviations: ANT = attentional network test; mTBI = mild traumatic brain injury; RT = reaction time
Received August 18, 2005. Revised September 30, 2005. Accepted November 1, 2005.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. H. Heitger, R. D. Jones, A. D. Macleod, D. L. Snell, C. M. Frampton, and T. J. Anderson Impaired eye movements in post-concussion syndrome indicate suboptimal brain function beyond the influence of depression, malingering or intellectual ability Brain, October 1, 2009; 132(10): 2850 - 2870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. N. Niogi, P. Mukherjee, J. Ghajar, C. E. Johnson, R. Kolster, H. Lee, M. Suh, R. D. Zimmerman, G. T. Manley, and B. D. McCandliss Structural dissociation of attentional control and memory in adults with and without mild traumatic brain injury Brain, December 1, 2008; 131(12): 3209 - 3221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Mayers Return-to-Play Criteria After Athletic Concussion: A Need for Revision Arch Neurol, September 1, 2008; 65(9): 1158 - 1161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. M Parker, L. R Osternig, P. van Donkelaar, and L.-S. Chou Recovery of cognitive and dynamic motor function following concussion Br. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2007; 41(12): 868 - 873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|