Skip Navigation


Brain Advance Access originally published online on December 4, 2006
Brain 2007 130(1):170-180; doi:10.1093/brain/awl333
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
130/1/170    most recent
awl333v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stinear, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Byblow, W. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stinear, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Byblow, W. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity

Cathy M. Stinear1, P. Alan Barber2, Peter R. Smale1,3, James P. Coxon1, Melanie K. Fleming1 and Winston D. Byblow1

1 Human Motor Control Laboratory, University of Auckland Auckland, New Zealand 2 Neurology Department Auckland, New Zealand 3 Radiology Department, Auckland City Hospital Auckland, New Zealand

Corresponding author: Winston Byblow, Human Motor Control Laboratory, Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand E-mail: w.byblow{at}auckland.ac.nz

Determining whether a person with stroke has reached their full potential for recovery is difficult. While techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and MRI have some prognostic value, their role in rehabilitation is undefined. This study used TMS and MRI to determine which factors predict functional potential, defined as an individual's capacity for further functional improvement at least 6 months following stroke. We studied 21 chronic stroke patients with upper limb impairment. The functional integrity of the corticospinal tracts (CSTs) was assessed using TMS and functional MRI. The presence or absence of motor-evoked responses (MEPs) to TMS in the affected upper limb, and the lateralization of cortical activity during affected hand use were determined. The structural integrity of the CST was assessed using MRI, and diffusion tensor imaging was used to measure the asymmetry in fractional anisotropy (FA) of the internal capsules. A multiple linear regression analysis was performed, to predict both clinical score at inception and change in clinical score for 17 patients who completed a 30 day programme of motor practice with the affected upper limb. The main findings were that in patients with MEPs, meaningful gains were still possible 3 years after stroke, although the capacity for improvement declined with time. In patients without MEPs, functional potential declines with increasing CST disruption, with no meaningful gains possible if FA asymmetry exceeds a value of 0.25. This study is the first to demonstrate the complementary nature of TMS and MRI techniques in predicting functional potential in chronic stroke patients. An algorithm is proposed for the selection of individualized rehabilitation strategies, based on the prediction of functional potential. These strategies could include neuromodulation using a range of emerging techniques, to prime the motor system for a plastic response to rehabilitation.

Key Words: rehabilitation outcomes; MRI/fMRI; motor performance; transcranial magnetic stimulation; diffusion tensor

Abbreviations: CST, corticospinal tract; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; FA, fractional anisotropy; fMRI, functional MRI; MEP, motor-evoked potential; M1, primary motor cortex; TMS, transcranial magnetic stimulation

Received July 11, 2006. Revised October 17, 2006. Accepted October 24, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
O. B.C. Swayne, J. C. Rothwell, N. S. Ward, and R. J. Greenwood
Stages of Motor Output Reorganization after Hemispheric Stroke Suggested by Longitudinal Studies of Cortical Physiology
Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2008; 18(8): 1909 - 1922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
P. Manganotti, M. Acler, G. P. Zanette, N. Smania, and A. Fiaschi
Motor Cortical Disinhibition During Early and Late Recovery After Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2008; 22(4): 396 - 403.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
O Noskin, J W Krakauer, R M Lazar, J R Festa, C Handy, K A O'Brien, and R S Marshall
Ipsilateral motor dysfunction from unilateral stroke: implications for the functional neuroanatomy of hemiparesis
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2008; 79(4): 401 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
C. D. Takahashi, L. Der-Yeghiaian, V. Le, R. R. Motiwala, and S. C. Cramer
Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke
Brain, February 1, 2008; 131(2): 425 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. Kalra and R. R. Ratan
Advances in Stroke Regenerative Medicine 2007
Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 273 - 275.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. C. Cramer, T. B. Parrish, R. M. Levy, G. T. Stebbins, S. D. Ruland, D. W. Lowry, T. P. Trouard, S. W. Squire, M. E. Weinand, C. R. Savage, et al.
Predicting Functional Gains in a Stroke Trial
Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2108 - 2114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. C. Cramer
The EXCITE Trial: A Major Step Forward for Restorative Therapies in Stroke
Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2204 - 2205.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.