Brain Advance Access originally published online on December 4, 2006
Brain 2007 130(1):170-180; doi:10.1093/brain/awl333
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity
1 Human Motor Control Laboratory, University of Auckland Auckland, New Zealand 2 Neurology Department Auckland, New Zealand 3 Radiology Department, Auckland City Hospital Auckland, New Zealand
Corresponding author: Winston Byblow, Human Motor Control Laboratory, Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand E-mail: w.byblow{at}auckland.ac.nz
Determining whether a person with stroke has reached their full potential for recovery is difficult. While techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and MRI have some prognostic value, their role in rehabilitation is undefined. This study used TMS and MRI to determine which factors predict functional potential, defined as an individual's capacity for further functional improvement at least 6 months following stroke. We studied 21 chronic stroke patients with upper limb impairment. The functional integrity of the corticospinal tracts (CSTs) was assessed using TMS and functional MRI. The presence or absence of motor-evoked responses (MEPs) to TMS in the affected upper limb, and the lateralization of cortical activity during affected hand use were determined. The structural integrity of the CST was assessed using MRI, and diffusion tensor imaging was used to measure the asymmetry in fractional anisotropy (FA) of the internal capsules. A multiple linear regression analysis was performed, to predict both clinical score at inception and change in clinical score for 17 patients who completed a 30 day programme of motor practice with the affected upper limb. The main findings were that in patients with MEPs, meaningful gains were still possible 3 years after stroke, although the capacity for improvement declined with time. In patients without MEPs, functional potential declines with increasing CST disruption, with no meaningful gains possible if FA asymmetry exceeds a value of 0.25. This study is the first to demonstrate the complementary nature of TMS and MRI techniques in predicting functional potential in chronic stroke patients. An algorithm is proposed for the selection of individualized rehabilitation strategies, based on the prediction of functional potential. These strategies could include neuromodulation using a range of emerging techniques, to prime the motor system for a plastic response to rehabilitation.
Key Words: rehabilitation outcomes; MRI/fMRI; motor performance; transcranial magnetic stimulation; diffusion tensor
Abbreviations: CST, corticospinal tract; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; FA, fractional anisotropy; fMRI, functional MRI; MEP, motor-evoked potential; M1, primary motor cortex; TMS, transcranial magnetic stimulation
Received July 11, 2006. Revised October 17, 2006. Accepted October 24, 2006.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. B.C. Swayne, J. C. Rothwell, N. S. Ward, and R. J. Greenwood Stages of Motor Output Reorganization after Hemispheric Stroke Suggested by Longitudinal Studies of Cortical Physiology Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2008; 18(8): 1909 - 1922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Manganotti, M. Acler, G. P. Zanette, N. Smania, and A. Fiaschi Motor Cortical Disinhibition During Early and Late Recovery After Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2008; 22(4): 396 - 403. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O Noskin, J W Krakauer, R M Lazar, J R Festa, C Handy, K A O'Brien, and R S Marshall Ipsilateral motor dysfunction from unilateral stroke: implications for the functional neuroanatomy of hemiparesis J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2008; 79(4): 401 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Takahashi, L. Der-Yeghiaian, V. Le, R. R. Motiwala, and S. C. Cramer Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke Brain, February 1, 2008; 131(2): 425 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Kalra and R. R. Ratan Advances in Stroke Regenerative Medicine 2007 Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 273 - 275. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Cramer, T. B. Parrish, R. M. Levy, G. T. Stebbins, S. D. Ruland, D. W. Lowry, T. P. Trouard, S. W. Squire, M. E. Weinand, C. R. Savage, et al. Predicting Functional Gains in a Stroke Trial Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2108 - 2114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Cramer The EXCITE Trial: A Major Step Forward for Restorative Therapies in Stroke Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2204 - 2205. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




