Skip Navigation

Brain 2007 130(12):3237-3249; doi:10.1093/brain/awm259
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Groen, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bushby, K. M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Groen, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bushby, K. M. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2007). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Analysis of the UK diagnostic strategy for limb girdle muscular dystrophy 2A

Emma J. Groen, Richard Charlton, Rita Barresi, Louise V. Anderson, Michelle Eagle, Judith Hudson, Mauro Santibanez Koref, Volker Straub and Katharine M. D. Bushby

Institute of Human Genetics, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

Correspondence to: Prof. K. M. D. Bushby, Institute of Human Genetics, International Centre for Life, Central Parkway, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 3BZ, UK E-mail: kate.bushby{at}ncl.ac.uk

Diagnosis of limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 2A can be complex due to phenotypic variability, lack of precision of protein analysis in muscle biopsies, and absence of mutational hot spots in the CAPN3 gene. The aim of this study was to review clinical and biopsy data from a group of patients with known CAPN3 genetic status to validate and refine our current diagnostic strategy, which combines clinical information and protein analysis to direct gene testing. We analysed 85 patients in whom CAPN3 gene sequencing had been performed. Forty-two patients had two mutations, 15 a single mutation and in 28 no mutation was found.

We identified clinical features that clearly discriminated the LGMD2A patients. These were: presence of scapular winging, contractures and normal respiratory function. In addition, a typical pattern of muscle weakness on manual muscle testing could be confirmed. Interpretation of protein expression obtained by Western blot was complex and involved the analysis of a number of bands detected by two antibodies for calpain 3. Loss of all calpain 3 bands was 100% specific for LGMD2A, but this pattern was found in only 23%. Absence or reduction of the ~60 kDa bands was also highly specific for LGMD2A, while increased abundance was highly predictive of no mutations being found even where other bands were reduced, suggesting that this is the most sensitive marker of artefactual protein degradation. Twenty-three percent of the patients with two mutations had normal full-sized calpain 3 protein, consistent with the finding of mutations localized in parts of the gene likely or proven to be involved in autolytic activity. Clinical and biochemical findings in patients with only one mutation were similar to patients with two mutations, indicating that other gene analysis techniques should be used before excluding the diagnosis.

Our analysis confirms that our strategy is still valid to prioritize genetic testing in this complex group of patients, provided patients with normal protein but a suggestive clinical phenotype are not excluded from genetic testing.

Key Words: calpain 3; limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 2A; CAPN3 mutation; Western blotting

Abbreviations: LGMD, Limb girdle muscular dystrophy; MMT, Manual Muscle Testing; FVC, forced vital capacity

Received May 3, 2007. Revised September 30, 2007. Accepted October 1, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.