Skip Navigation


Brain Advance Access originally published online on November 26, 2008
Brain 2009 132(1):103-115; doi:10.1093/brain/awn306
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
132/1/103    most recent
awn306v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sander, T.
Right arrow Articles by Helmchen, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sander, T.
Right arrow Articles by Helmchen, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2008). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Vergence deficits in patients with cerebellar lesions

T. Sander1, A. Sprenger1, G. Neumann1, B. Machner1, S. Gottschalk2, H. Rambold1 and C. Helmchen1

1 Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Germany 2 Institute of Neuroradiology, University Lübeck, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany

Correspondence to: Thurid Sander, MD, Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany E-mail: thurid.sander{at}neuro.uni-luebeck.de

The cerebellum is part of the cortico–ponto–cerebellar circuit for conjugate eye movements. Recent animal data suggest an additional role of the cerebellum for the control of binocular alignment and disconjugate, i.e. vergence eye movements. The latter is separated into two different components: fast vergence (to step targets) and slow vergence (to ramp and sinusoidal targets). The aim of this study was to investigate whether circumscribed cerebellar lesions affect these dynamic vergence eye movements. Disconjugate fast and slow vergence, conjugate smooth pursuit and saccades were binocularly recorded by a scleral search coil system in 20 patients with acute cerebellar lesions (all ischemic strokes except for one) and 20 age-matched healthy controls. Patients showed impairment of slow vergence while fast vergence was unaffected. Slow vergence gain to sinusoidal targets was significantly reduced, both in convergence and divergence direction. Divergence but not convergence velocity to ramp targets was reduced. Conjugate smooth pursuit eye movements to sinusoidal and to step-ramp targets were impaired. Patients had saccadic hypometria. All defects were particularly expressed in patients with vermis lesions. In contrast to recent animal data fast vergence was not impaired in any of our patient subgroups. We conclude that (i) the human cerebellum, in particular the vermis, is involved in the processing of dynamic vergence eye movements and (ii) cerebellar lesions elicit dissociable effects on fast and slow vergence.

Key Words: fast vergence; slow vergence; divergence; vermis

Abbreviations: FEF, frontal eye field; FOR, fastigial oculomotor region; IP, posterior interposed nucleus; MST, medial superior temporal area; NRTP, nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis; SEF, supplementary eye field; SE, standard error; SPEM, smooth pursuit eye movements.

Received June 30, 2008. Revised September 22, 2008. Accepted October 21, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
B. Baier, P. Stoeter, and M. Dieterich
Anatomical correlates of ocular motor deficits in cerebellar lesions
Brain, August 1, 2009; 132(8): 2114 - 2124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.