Brain Advance Access published online on January 19, 2005
Brain, doi:10.1093/brain/awh387
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Summary The Declarative/Procedural Model of Pinker, Ullman and colleagues claims that the basal ganglia are part of a fronto-striatal procedural memory system which applies grammatical rules to combine morphemes (the smallest meaningful units in language) into complex words (e.g. talk-ed, talk-ing). We tested this claim by investigating whether striatal damage or loss of its dopaminergic innervation is reliably associated with selective regular past tense deficits in patients with subcortical cerebrovascular damage, Parkinson's disease or Huntington's disease. We focused on past tense morphology since this allows us to contrast the regular past tense (jump-jumped), which is rule-based, with the irregular past tense (sleep-slept), which is not. We used elicitation and priming tasks to test patients' ability to comprehend and produce inflected forms. We found no evidence of a consistent association between striatal dysfunction and selective impairment of regular past tense morphology, suggesting that the basal ganglia are not essential for processing the regular past tense as a sequence of morphemes, either in comprehension or production, in contrast to the claims of the Declarative/Procedural Model. All patient groups showed normal activation of semantic and morphological representations in comprehension, despite difficulties suppressing semantically appropriate alternatives when trying to inflect novel verbs. This is consistent with previous reports that striatal dysfunction spares automatic activation of linguistic information, but disrupts later language processes that require inhibition of competing alternatives.
Received April 30, 2004
Revised December 9, 2004
Accepted December 10, 2004
Article
The basal ganglia and rule-governed language use: evidence from vascular and degenerative conditions
2 Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
3 Cambridge Centre for Brain Repair, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
4 MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK
L. K. Tyler, E-mail: lktyler{at}csl.psychol.cam.ac.uk
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. L. Seghier and C. J. Price Reading Aloud Boosts Connectivity through the Putamen Cereb Cortex, June 26, 2009; (2009) bhp123v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. De Diego-Balaguer, M. Couette, G. Dolbeau, A. Durr, K. Youssov, and A.-C. Bachoud-Levi Striatal degeneration impairs language learning: evidence from Huntington's disease Brain, November 1, 2008; 131(11): 2870 - 2881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. JUSTUS, J. LARSEN, P. D. M. DAVIES, and D. SWICK Interpreting dissociations between regular and irregular past-tense morphology: Evidence from event-related potentials Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, June 1, 2008; 8(2): 178 - 194. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Teichmann, V. Gaura, J.-F. Demonet, F. Supiot, M. Delliaux, C. Verny, P. Renou, P. Remy, and A.-C. Bachoud-Levi Language processing within the striatum: evidence from a PET correlation study in Huntington's disease Brain, April 1, 2008; 131(4): 1046 - 1056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. McCracken, P. Hudson, R. Ellis, A. McCaddon, and the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function an Methylmalonic acid and cognitive function in the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2006; 84(6): 1406 - 1411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|