Skip Navigation



Brain Advance Access published online on September 29, 2005

Brain, doi:10.1093/brain/awh636
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
128/11/2507    most recent
awh636v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Sudlow, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Sudlow, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received May 9, 2005
Revised July 29, 2005
Accepted August 23, 2005

Review Article

Comparing risks of death and recurrent vascular events between lacunar and non-lacunar infarction

Caroline Jackson 1 and Cathie Sudlow 1*

1 Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cathie Sudlow, E-mail: cathie.sudlow{at}ed.ac.uk


   Abstract

Differences in prognosis of lacunar and non-lacunar infarction patients might support distinct arterial pathological processes underlying these two subtypes of ischaemic stroke. We performed a systematic review in which we identified cohort studies with ischaemic stroke subtype-specific follow-up data on death, recurrent stroke and/or myocardial infarction (MI). We calculated risks of death and recurrent stroke at 1 month, 1-12 months and 1-5 years, as well as risks of MI and cardiac death. We compared non-lacunar with lacunar infarction, using study-specific and summary odds ratios. We also compared the pattern of recurrent stroke subtypes after lacunar and non-lacunar infarction. One month odds of death and of recurrent stroke were significantly greater following non-lacunar than lacunar infarction, but the difference decreased thereafter (1 month mortality: OR 3.81, 95% CI 2.77-5.23; 1-12 month mortality: OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.74-3.08; 1-5 year mortality: OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.28-2.45; 1 month stroke recurrence: OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.20-3.69; 1-12 month stroke recurrence: OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.85-1.83; 1-5 year stroke recurrence: OR 1.61, 95% CI 0.96-2.70). Recurrent strokes were more likely to be lacunar if the index event was lacunar. Few studies reported on the risk of MI, but we found no significant difference in risk of cardiac death in non-lacunar versus lacunar infarction. Thus, although early mortality and stroke recurrence risks are higher among non-lacunar than lacunar infarct patients, the risks appear not to differ in the longer term and the risks of cardiac outcomes are similar, although data are limited. There is some evidence that recurrent ischaemic stroke subtypes breed true. These results provide limited support for a distinct arterial pathology underlying lacunar infarction.

Keywords: stroke; lacunar infarction; epidemiology.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. I. Prodan, A. S. Vincent, R. Padmanabhan, and G. L. Dale
Coated-Platelet Levels Are Low in Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): 2578 - 2580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. L. Bailey, J. McCulloch, C. Sudlow, and J. M. Wardlaw
Potential Animal Models of Lacunar Stroke: A Systematic Review
Stroke, June 1, 2009; 40(6): e451 - e458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. Amarenco, O. Benavente, L. B. Goldstein, A. Callahan III, H. Sillesen, M. G. Hennerici, S. Gilbert, A. E. Rudolph, L. Simunovic, J. A. Zivin, et al.
Results of the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) Trial by Stroke Subtypes
Stroke, April 1, 2009; 40(4): 1405 - 1409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PNHome page
B Norrving
Lacunar infarcts: no black holes in the brain are benign
Practical Neurology, August 1, 2008; 8(4): 222 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Ois, M. Gomis, A. Rodriguez-Campello, E. Cuadrado-Godia, J. Jimenez-Conde, C. Pont-Sunyer, G. Cuccurella, and J. Roquer
Factors Associated With a High Risk of Recurrence in Patients With Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Stroke
Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1717 - 1721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
A Arboix, A Font, C Garro, L Garcia-Eroles, E Comes, and J Massons
Recurrent lacunar infarction following a previous lacunar stroke: a clinical study of 122 patients
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2007; 78(12): 1392 - 1394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. M. Carter, A. J. Catto, M. W. Mansfield, J. M. Bamford, and P. J. Grant
Predictive Variables for Mortality After Acute Ischemic Stroke
Stroke, June 1, 2007; 38(6): 1873 - 1880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
F. Gongora-Rivera, J. Labreuche, A. Jaramillo, P. G. Steg, J.-J. Hauw, and P. Amarenco
Autopsy Prevalence of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients With Fatal Stroke
Stroke, April 1, 2007; 38(4): 1203 - 1210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. H.A. Halkes, L. J. Kappelle, J. van Gijn, I. van Wijk, P. J. Koudstaal, and A. Algra
Large Subcortical Infarcts: Clinical Features, Risk Factors, and Long-Term Prognosis Compared With Cortical and Small Deep Infarcts
Stroke, July 1, 2006; 37(7): 1828 - 1832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.