Skip Navigation



Brain Advance Access published online on November 29, 2005
Brain, doi:10.1093/brain/awh678
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
129/1/158    most recent
awh678v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Leff, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Leff, A. P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received June 1, 2005
Revised October 3, 2005
Accepted October 10, 2005

Article

Patients with hemianopic alexia adopt an inefficient eye movement strategy when reading text

Scott A. McDonald 1, Galina Spitsyna 2, Richard C. Shillcock 1, Richard J. S. Wise 2, and Alexander P. Leff 2 *

1 Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
2 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Free Hospital and University College Medical School, London, UK; MRC Clinical Sciences Centre and Division of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Alexander P. Leff, E-mail: alexander.leff{at}imperial.ac.uk


  Abstract

Patients with an acquired homonymous hemianopia often adapt over a period of a few months to compensate for some of the impairments caused by their visual field defect. Changes in their eye movement patterns have been demonstrated as performance on visual tasks improves with time; however, these patients often complain of persistent text reading problems. Using a video-based eye-movement tracking system, we investigated the text reading behaviour of patients with established hemianopic alexia (>6 months post deficit), a condition affecting left-to-right readers, with a homonymous field defect that encroaches into their right foveal/parafoveal visual field. Word-based analyses of text reading are standard in experiments involving normal readers, but this is the first time these methods have been extended to patients with hemianopic alexia. Using this method, we compared the patients' reading scanpaths to those generated by normal controls reading the same passages, and a random model generated by matching the patients' eye movement data to random permutations of the text they read. We demonstrate that patients adopt an inefficient reading strategy, fixating to the left of the preferred viewing location of words of four letters and longer. Fixating to the left of the normal preferred viewing location not only results in less of the fixated word being processed by the language system; ensuing fixations are also more likely to land within the same word (a refixation). It is this refixation rate that is the main factor in slowing reading times in these patients. Our data suggests that patients are able to extract some useful visual information from text to aid the planning of reading scanpaths as their behaviour differs critically from the random model. Potential reasons for this patient group failing to produce an effective reading strategy are discussed.

Keywords: hemianopia; reading; eye movements; alexia; fixations.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cereb CortexHome page
R. Starrfelt, T. Habekost, and A. P. Leff
Too Little, Too Late: Reduced Visual Span and Speed Characterize Pure Alexia
Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2009; 19(12): 2880 - 2890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BrainHome page
T. Pflugshaupt, K. Gutbrod, P. Wurtz, R. von Wartburg, T. Nyffeler, B. de Haan, H.-O. Karnath, and R. M. Mueri
About the role of visual field defects in pure alexia
Brain, July 1, 2009; 132(7): 1907 - 1917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
K. R. Huxlin, T. Martin, K. Kelly, M. Riley, D. I. Friedman, W. S. Burgin, and M. Hayhoe
Perceptual Relearning of Complex Visual Motion after V1 Damage in Humans
J. Neurosci., April 1, 2009; 29(13): 3981 - 3991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BrainHome page
S. Schuett, C. A. Heywood, R. W. Kentridge, and J. Zihl
Rehabilitation of hemianopic dyslexia: are words necessary for re-learning oculomotor control?
Brain, December 1, 2008; 131(12): 3156 - 3168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NeurologyHome page
G. A. Spitzyna, R.J.S. Wise, S. A. McDonald, G. T. Plant, D. Kidd, H. Crewes, and A. P. Leff
Optokinetic therapy improves text reading in patients with hemianopic alexia: A controlled trial
Neurology, May 29, 2007; 68(22): 1922 - 1930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BrainHome page
D. N. Levine
Patients who complain of difficulty in reading following left occipitotemporal infarction with right homonymous hemianopia.
Brain, April 1, 2006; 129(Pt 4): E44 - E44.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.