Skip Navigation



Brain Advance Access published online on April 25, 2006

Brain, doi:10.1093/brain/awl093
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
129/6/1399    most recent
awl093v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilboa, A.
Right arrow Articles by Moscovitch, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gilboa, A.
Right arrow Articles by Moscovitch, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received October 31, 2005
Revised February 17, 2006
Accepted March 22, 2006

Article

Mechanisms of spontaneous confabulations: a strategic retrieval account

Asaf Gilboa 1 *, Claude Alain 2, Donald T. Stuss 3, Brenda Melo 4, Sarah Miller 5, and Morris Moscovitch 2

1 Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
2 Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
3 Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine (Neurology, Rehabilitation Science), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
4 Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
5 Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Asaf Gilboa, E-mail: agilboa{at}psy.haifa.ac.il


   Abstract

The ‘temporality’ hypothesis of confabulation posits that confabulations are true memories displaced in time, while the ‘strategic retrieval’ hypothesis suggests a general retrieval failure of which temporal confusion is a common symptom. Four confabulating patients with rupture of an anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysm, eight non-confabulating ACoA controls and 16 normal controls participated in three experiments designed to test the two hypotheses. In Experiment 1, participants were tested on two continuous recognition tasks, one requiring temporal context distinctions, previously shown to be sensitive to confabulation and another that only requires content distinctions. Both manipulations were sensitive to confabulation, but not specific to it. Temporal context and content confusions (TCCs and CCs) can be explained as failures to make fine-grained distinctions within memory. In Experiment 2, free recall of semantic narratives that require strategic retrieval but are independent of temporal context was used to induce confabulations associated with remote memory, acquired before the onset of amnesia. Confabulators produced significantly more errors. Thus, when retrieval demands are equated, confabulations can be induced in the absence of temporal confusions. Only confabulators conflated semantic content from different remote semantic narratives and introduced idiosyncratic content, suggesting that qualitatively different mechanisms are responsible for distortions due to normal memory failure and for confabulation. Lesion analyses revealed that damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex is sufficient for temporal context errors to occur, but additional orbitofrontal damage is crucial for spontaneous confabulation. In Experiment 3, we tested whether failure in memory monitoring is crucial for confabulation. Recognition of details from semantic and autobiographical narratives was used to minimize the initiation and search components of strategic retrieval. Only confabulators made more false alarms on both tasks, endorsed even highly implausible lures related to autobiographical events and were indiscriminately confident about their choices. These findings support a strategic retrieval account of confabulation of which monitoring is a critical component. Post-retrieval monitoring has at least two components: one is early, rapid and pre-conscious and the other is conscious and elaborate. Failure of at least the former is necessary and sufficient for confabulation. Other deficits, including TCC and CC, may be required for spontaneous confabulations to arise. The confluence of different sub-components of strategic retrieval would determine the content of confabulation and exacerbate its occurrence.

Keywords: spontaneous confabulations; provoked confabulations; confabulatory amnesia; temporal context confusion; content confusion strategic retrieval; aneurysms.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Gilboa, C. Alain, Y. He, D. T. Stuss, and M. Moscovitch
Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Lesions Produce Early Functional Alterations during Remote Memory Retrieval
J. Neurosci., April 15, 2009; 29(15): 4871 - 4881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Alcohol AlcoholHome page
M. D. Kopelman, A. D. Thomson, I. Guerrini, and E. J. Marshall
The Korsakoff Syndrome: Clinical Aspects, Psychology and Treatment
Alcohol Alcohol., March 1, 2009; 44(2): 148 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
D. L Schacter and D. R. Addis
The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future
Phil Trans R Soc B, May 29, 2007; 362(1481): 773 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch NeurologyHome page
The Cognitive and Neuroanatomic Underpinnings of Confabulation
Journal Watch Neurology, July 25, 2006; 2006(725): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.