Skip Navigation



Brain Advance Access published online on September 19, 2006

Brain, doi:10.1093/brain/awl244
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
129/12/3315    most recent
awl244v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by du Boisgueheneuc, F.
Right arrow Articles by Dubois, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by du Boisgueheneuc, F.
Right arrow Articles by Dubois, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received December 16, 2005
Revised August 4, 2006
Accepted August 10, 2006

Article

Functions of the left superior frontal gyrus in humans: a lesion study

Foucaud du Boisgueheneuc 1, Richard Levy 2 *, Emmanuelle Volle 3, Magali Seassau 4, Hughes Duffau 5, Serge Kinkingnehun 3, Yves Samson 6, Sandy Zhang 7, and Bruno Dubois 2

1 Federation de Neurologie, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; INSERM U.610, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
2 Federation de Neurologie, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; INSERM U.610, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Paris, France
3 INSERM U.610, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Service de Neuroradiologie, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Paris, France
4 INSERM U.610, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Paris, France
5 Service de Neurochirurgie, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
6 Urgences cérébro-vasculaires, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
7 INSERM U.610, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Richard Levy, E-mail: richard.levy{at}psl.aphp.fr


   Abstract

The superior frontal gyrus (SFG) is thought to contribute to higher cognitive functions and particularly to working memory (WM), although the nature of its involvement remains a matter of debate. To resolve this issue, methodological tools such as lesion studies are needed to complement the functional imaging approach. We have conducted the first lesion study to investigate the role of the SFG in WM and address the following questions: do lesions of the SFG impair WM and, if so, what is the nature of the WM impairment? To answer these questions, we compared the performance of eight patients with a left prefrontal lesion restricted to the SFG with that of a group of 11 healthy control subjects and two groups of patients with focal brain lesions [prefrontal lesions sparing the SFG (n = 5) and right parietal lesions (n = 4)] in a series of WM tasks. The WM tasks (derived from the classical n-back paradigm) allowed us to study the impact of the SFG lesions on domain (verbal, spatial, face) and complexity (1-, 2- and 3-back) processing within WM. As expected, patients with a left SFG lesion exhibited a WM deficit when compared with all control groups, and the impairment increased with the complexity of the tasks. This complexity effect was significantly more marked for the spatial domain. Voxel-to-voxel mapping of each subject's performance showed that the lateral and posterior portion of the SFG (mostly Brodmann area 8, rostral to the frontal eye field) was the subregion that contributed the most to the WM impairment. These data led us to conclude that (i) the lateral and posterior portion of the left SFG is a key component of the neural network of WM; (ii) the participation of this region in WM is triggered by the highest level of executive processing; (iii) the left SFG is also involved in spatially oriented processing. Our findings support a hybrid model of the anatomical and functional organization of the lateral SFG for WM, according to which this region is involved in higher levels of WM processing (monitoring and manipulation) but remains oriented towards spatial cognition, although the domain specificity is not exclusive and is overridden by an increase in executive demand, regardless of the domain being processed. From a clinical perspective, this study provides new information on the impact of left SFG lesions on cognition that will be of use to neurologists and neurosurgeons.

Keywords: prefrontal cortex; working memory; cognitive functions; human; neuropsychology.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
E. Volle, S. Kinkingnehun, J.-B. Pochon, K. Mondon, M. Thiebaut de Schotten, M. Seassau, H. Duffau, Y. Samson, B. Dubois, and R. Levy
The Functional Architecture of the Left Posterior and Lateral Prefrontal Cortex in Humans
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2008; 18(10): 2460 - 2469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
E. Mandonnet, A. Nouet, P. Gatignol, L. Capelle, and H. Duffau
Does the left inferior longitudinal fasciculus play a role in language? A brain stimulation study
Brain, March 1, 2007; 130(3): 623 - 629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.