Skip Navigation



Brain Advance Access published online on February 7, 2008

Brain, doi:10.1093/brain/awn011
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
131/3/829    most recent
awn011v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bellebaum, C.
Right arrow Articles by Daum, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bellebaum, C.
Right arrow Articles by Daum, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2008). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Focal basal ganglia lesions are associated with impairments in reward-based reversal learning

Christian Bellebaum1, Benno Koch2, Michael Schwarz2 and Irene Daum1

1Department of Neuropsychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr-University Bochum and 2Department of Neurology, Klinikum Dortmund, Germany

Correspondence to: Correspondence to: Dr Christian Bellebaum, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Neuropsychology, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Universitaetsstraße 150, D-44780 Bochum, Germany E-mail: christian.bellebaum{at}rub.de

The basal ganglia (BG) are thought to play a key role in learning from feedback, with mesencephalic dopamine neurons coding errors in reward prediction, thereby mediating information processing in the BG and the prefrontal cortex. In the present study, reward-based learning was assessed in patients with focal BG lesions, by studying outcome-based acquisition and reversal of stimulus–stimulus associations with different reward magnitudes in two probabilistic learning tasks. Eleven patients with selective BG lesions (three females) and 18 healthy control subjects (six females) participated in this study. Two cognitive transfer tasks provided a measure of declarative learning strategy application. On the group level, BG patients showed deficits in reversal learning, with dorsal striatum lesion patients being most severely affected. While basic mechanisms of learning from feedback such as the processing of different reward magnitudes appeared to be intact, patients needed more trials than controls to learn a second reward-based task, suggesting reduced carry-over effects in learning. A patient with a bilateral BG lesion showed better performance than controls on most learning tasks, applying a compensatory declarative learning strategy. The results are discussed in terms of the implication of different BG subregions in different aspects of learning from feedback.

Key Words: reward; basal ganglia; striatum; learning; reversal

Abbreviations: BA, basal ganglia; DA, dopamine; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MTL, medial temporal lobe; Put, putamen; RT, reaction time; SD, standard deviation; TIA, transient ischaemic attack

Received September 10, 2007. Revised January 8, 2008. Accepted January 10, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
L. W. de Jong, K. van der Hiele, I. M. Veer, J. J. Houwing, R. G. J. Westendorp, E. L. E. M. Bollen, P. W. de Bruin, H. A. M. Middelkoop, M. A. van Buchem, and J. van der Grond
Strongly reduced volumes of putamen and thalamus in Alzheimer's disease: an MRI study
Brain, December 1, 2008; 131(12): 3277 - 3285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.