Brain Advance Access published online on March 31, 2009
Brain, doi:10.1093/brain/awp062
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Serial PIB and MRI in normal, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: implications for sequence of pathological events in Alzheimer's disease

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA 2 Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA 3 Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA 4 Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of California at San Francisco and Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases, San Francisco, CA, USA
Correspondence to:
Clifford R. Jack, Jr, MD, Mayo Clinic, Diagnostic Radiology, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA E-mail: jack.clifford{at}mayo.edu
The purpose of this study was to use serial imaging to gain insight into the sequence of pathologic events in Alzheimer's disease, and the clinical features associated with this sequence. We measured change in amyloid deposition over time using serial 11C Pittsburgh compound B (PIB) positron emission tomography and progression of neurodegeneration using serial structural magnetic resonance imaging. We studied 21 healthy cognitively normal subjects, 32 with amnestic mild cognitive impairment and 8 with Alzheimer's disease. Subjects were drawn from two sources—ongoing longitudinal registries at Mayo Clinic, and the Alzheimer's disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). All subjects underwent clinical assessments, MRI and PIB studies at two time points, approximately one year apart. PIB retention was quantified in global cortical to cerebellar ratio units and brain atrophy in units of cm3 by measuring ventricular expansion. The annual change in global PIB retention did not differ by clinical group (P = 0.90), and although small (median 0.042 ratio units/year overall) was greater than zero among all subjects (P < 0.001). Ventricular expansion rates differed by clinical group (P < 0.001) and increased in the following order: cognitively normal (1.3 cm3/year) < amnestic mild cognitive impairment (2.5 cm3/year) < Alzheimer's disease (7.7 cm3/year). Among all subjects there was no correlation between PIB change and concurrent change on CDR-SB (r = –0.01, P = 0.97) but some evidence of a weak correlation with MMSE (r =–0.22, P = 0.09). In contrast, greater rates of ventricular expansion were clearly correlated with worsening concurrent change on CDR-SB (r = 0.42, P < 0.01) and MMSE (r =–0.52, P < 0.01). Our data are consistent with a model of typical late onset Alzheimer's disease that has two main features: (i) dissociation between the rate of amyloid deposition and the rate of neurodegeneration late in life, with amyloid deposition proceeding at a constant slow rate while neurodegeneration accelerates and (ii) clinical symptoms are coupled to neurodegeneration not amyloid deposition. Significant plaque deposition occurs prior to clinical decline. The presence of brain amyloidosis alone is not sufficient to produce cognitive decline, rather, the neurodegenerative component of Alzheimer's disease pathology is the direct substrate of cognitive impairment and the rate of cognitive decline is driven by the rate of neurodegeneration. Neurodegeneration (atrophy on MRI) both precedes and parallels cognitive decline. This model implies a complimentary role for MRI and PIB imaging in Alzheimer's disease, with each reflecting one of the major pathologies, amyloid dysmetabolism and neurodegeneration.
Key Words: Alzheimer's disease; amyloid imaging; magnetic resonance imaging, longitudinal imaging; mild cognitive impairment; Pittsburgh compound B
Abbreviations: AD = Alzheimer's disease, ; MCI = mild cognitive impairment, ; CN = cognitively normal, ; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, ; PIB = 11C Pittsburgh compound B,
.
Received December 30, 2008. Revised February 9, 2009. Accepted February 16, 2009.
Some of the data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer's disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (http://www.loni.ucla.edu/ADNI). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report. ADNI investigators include (complete listing available at www.loni.ucla.edu\ADNI\Collaboration\ADNI_Manuscript_Citations.pdf)
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. J. Killiany Isn't amyloid more than just a marker for Alzheimer disease? Neurology, October 13, 2009; 73(15): 1174 - 1175. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hedden, K. R. A. Van Dijk, J. A. Becker, A. Mehta, R. A. Sperling, K. A. Johnson, and R. L. Buckner Disruption of Functional Connectivity in Clinically Normal Older Adults Harboring Amyloid Burden J. Neurosci., October 7, 2009; 29(40): 12686 - 12694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Visser and D. S. Knopman Amyloid imaging in the prediction of Alzheimer-type dementia in subjects with amnestic MCI Neurology, September 8, 2009; 73(10): 744 - 745. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Petersen and J. Q. Trojanowski Use of Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers: Potentially Yes for Clinical Trials but Not Yet for Clinical Practice JAMA, July 22, 2009; 302(4): 436 - 437. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


